Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18213 (CAL)

SAGRAM HEMRAM@SHEGRAM HEMRAM@HEMBRAM AND ORS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(A)/8/2026 · 2026-01-07

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.01.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.53 CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI Ct.No.3 dc. Partly Allowed C.R.M. (A) 8 of 2026 In Re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Phansidewa Police Station Case No. 521 of 2025 dated 06.12.2025 under Sections 85/109/82(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In Re : Sagram Hemram @ Shegram Hemram @ Hembram and Others ... Petitioners. Mr. Jaydeep Kanta Bhowmik, Mr. Sayantan Bhowmik, Mr. Shubham Kumar, Ms. Sayantani Das ... For the Petitioners. Mr. Kallol Acharjee, Mr. Saikat Chatterjee, Mr. Chattu Roy ... For the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that after 25 years of marriage, the petitioner no.1 and all his family members have been implicated in connection with the instant case. According to the petitioners, the accusations made against them are without any factual foundation and as such, they may be granted the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim as well as the statement of the neighbours. 2 I have taken into account the injury report and the statement of the victim and having considered the same, I am of the view that the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.1 viz. Sagram Hemram @ Shegram Hemram @ Hembram is rejected. However, so far as the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are concerned, I am of the opinion that their custodial interrogation is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 is allowed. Accordingly, in the event of arrest, the petitioners viz., 2. Ramesh Hemram @ Hembram, 3. Dunui Hemram @ Hembram, 4. Chunu Hemram @ Hembram and 5. Basanti Hemram shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The application for anticipatory bail, being CRM (A) 8 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of. All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)