Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18212 (KAR)

SMT. GEETHA.A v. MYSURU DISTRICT CO OPERATIVE MILK FEDERATION (NANDINI MILK PARLOUR)

WA/1096/2026 · 2026-06-01

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25513-DB WA No. 1096 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT APPEAL NO. 1096 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GEETHA. A AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS W/O M. RAVI R/O NO.1079. 34TH CROSS 4TH MAIN, VIDYARANYAPURAM MYSURU MYSURU DISTRICT - 570 008 …APPELLANT (BY SRI SATHYANARAYANA SINGH R.B, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MYSURU DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK FEDERATION (NANDINI MILK PARLOUR) BANNUR ROAD ALANAHALLI POST MYSURU - 570 028 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2. THE DIRECTOR (MARKETING) MYSURU DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK FEDERATION BANNUR ROAD ALANAHALLI POST MYSURU - 570 028 …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25513-DB WA No. 1096 of 2026 THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT R/W ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.02.2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P NO.4453/2026 (CS-RES) CONSEQUENTLY & ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 23.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.4453/2026 (CS-RES). The appellant had filed the said writ petition impugning an order dated 27.01.2026, whereby the licence granted to the petitioner to run a milk booth located in the court complex, Mysuru, was cancelled. 2. The appellant states that she was running the business of a Nandini Milk Parlour from the said booth since 2007-08. The booth had become old and needed repair and, accordingly, she was instructed to vacate the same and handover the old stock in the shop, for carrying on such renovation. The appellant was not allotted the milk booth after it was renovated and this led the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25513-DB WA No. 1096 of 2026 appellant to file a writ petition, being W.P No.16727/2025. The appellant's licence was cancelled in view of certain allegations, including that of misbehaviour with the staff. The said writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to hold an enquiry in regard to the said allegations and afford the appellant an opportunity to be heard. The respondents, once again passed a cancellation order dated 27.01.2026, which was communicated to the appellant on 05.02.2026. 3. The learned Single Judge did not interfere with the said order in view of the allegations that the appellant had failed to pay the electricity charges of the milk booth in question. The learned Single Judge also noted that in furtherance of the orders passed by the court, an enquiry was conducted and the cancellation order dated 27.01.2026 was passed thereafter. The appellant disputes the same. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that there have been further developments and the booth in question has since been removed from the old court complex. Thus, in any event, the appellant cannot be granted a licence to run the said booth. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25513-DB WA No. 1096 of 2026 5. In the given circumstances, the present appeal has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE AHB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 36