[2026:JHHC:18947] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2383 of 2026 ------ Sadab Alam @ Shadab Alam, Aged about 30 years, S/o- Aftab Alam, R/O- Road No.3 Sal Bagan, Daiguttu, Zakir Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Azadnagar, Town Jamshedpur, Dist.- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha (4), Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-29-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 (S) corresponding to S.T. Case No. 11 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308(4), 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons demanded extortion of Rs.10,00,000/- from the informant by making him talk to one Shrawan over mobile phone but the informant refused the payment of the extortion. After some time, the petitioner the co-accused persons abused and assaulted the informant including with the butt of the fire arm 2-3 times upon his head and also looted his gold chain and cash of Rs.15,000/- to Rs.20,000/- from his drawer and on being protested, shot him two times on his right thigh. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not name in the FIR but without putting him under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-4 of the supplementary affidavit, charge sheet has been submitted against him but no witness has been examined as yet as mentioned in para-3 of the supplementary affidavit. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.08.2025 mentioned in para-6 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella in connection with Kandra P.S. Case No.15 of 2025 (S) corresponding to S.T. Case No. 11 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 29.06.2026 Saroj/