Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1821 (ALL)

CHANCHAL v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/16004/2026 · 2026-05-11

Ashutosh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16004 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant, today in the Court, which is taken on record. Heard Shri Ashvani Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Bijendra Kumar, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Chanchal, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 947 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Bisrakh, District Gautam Buddha. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 11.12.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly circumstanced co-accused Indramani @ Raja @ Indra, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court on 26.04.2026 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10180 of 2026. Applicant has no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashvani Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mansi Mishra, Pramod Kumar Chanchal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Chanchal, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co- operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. May 12, 2026 Vibha Singh BAIL No. 16004 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad