SHAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD THR. CHAIRMAN SUNITA C. PATIL v. VAISHNAVI VIJAY SANKPAL AND ORS
CRA/118/2026 · 2026-10-12
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18204 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18204 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19-CRA118-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2026 Sham Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd Thr. Chairman Sunita C. Patil ...Applicant Versus Vaishnavi Vijay Sankpal and Ors. ...Respondents _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Rohan Patil, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Yuvaraj Gharal a/w Vishal Sarnaik, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and 2. _______________________________________________________________
CORAM :
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 12th October, 2026.
P.C. :
1. By the present Civil Revision Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a):- (a) Rule be issued, record and proceedings be called for and after examining legality and validity thereof, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside order dated 13/08/2026 passed by Ld. Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur on application at Ex. 26 in Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026 being
“Exhibit-E” to this Civil Revision Application, be quashed and set aside;
2. Mr. Rohan Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to raise all the objections on maintainability as well as on merits of the Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026, before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur during the trial of the Regular Arjun 1
19-CRA118-2026.doc Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026.
3. The request made by Mr. Rohan Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, is not opposed by Mr. Yuvaraj Gharal, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who in fact submits that all the
contentions in this Civil Revision Application will have to be considered on merits of the Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026.
4. In view of the statements made by Mr. Rohan Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed.
5. All contentions of the parties are expressly left open to be adjudicated during the trial of Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026.
6. Civil Revision Application No. 118 of 2026 is disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun 2 ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Digitally signed by ARJUN KRISHNA RODGE Date: 2026.10.13 14:39:12 +0530