IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.924 of 2026 Date of decision:31.07.2026 Karnail Singh ...Petitioner Versus Ajay Sharma ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 1341 of 2026 on 24.02.2026. 2. This Court had issued notice to the respondent on 28.07.2026 and learned Additional Advocate General was directed to have current instruction in the matter. 3. Today, the learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 29.07.2026, whereby the representation as filed by the present petitioner has been considered Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- and allowed and the grievances of the present petitioner stand redressed. 4. Faced with this situation, learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition can be closed as the judgment stands duly complied with. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any. Notice discharged. (Romesh Verma) Judge 31st July, 2026. (vt)