$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010433732026 + W.P.(C) 13385/2026 M/S A VISA EXPERT LLC .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam Singh & Mr. Shlok Mittal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nishant Guatam, CGSC with Mr. Vanshul Pali, GP and with Mr. Vineet Negi, Ms. Kavya Shukla, Mr. Vaibhav V. Nath and Ms. Nandini Singh, Advocates for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA O R D E R % 14.09.2026 CM APPL. 62268/2026 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 13385/2026 3. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs: “...a) issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing Respondent No. 2 to decide Appeal No. 47807/2026 filed by Petitioner on 14.07.2026, with due expedition and within a time-bound period to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court, having regard to the direction issued by this Hon'ble Court in This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:08:52 Subodh v. Union of India & Anr., W.P.(C) 6869/2026, order dated 18.05.2026, b) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No. 3 to restore Petitioner's Instagram business accounts “A Visa Expert” (@avisaexpert) and “A Visa Experts India” (@avisaexpertsindia), pending adjudication of Appeal No. 47807/2026, or, in the alternative, to undertake and communicate a reasoned review of the suspension in accordance with the applicable provisions of the IT Rules, 2021, c) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No. 3 to disclose to Petitioner the specific reasons and the particular content relied upon for suspension of the said accounts, so as to enable Petitioner to effectively understand and dispute the basis of the impugned action, in accordance with the applicable statutory safeguards, d) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No. 1 to ensure compliance by Respondent No. 3 with the applicable obligations under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the IT Rules, 2021, and to take such action as may be warranted in accordance with law, e) pass an ad-interim order directing Respondent No. 3 to restore Petitioner's accounts pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition, or pass such other interim direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances, having regard to the continuing business prejudice suffered by Petitioner and the pendency of the statutory appeal, f) award costs of the present proceedings in favour of Petitioner and against the Respondents...” 4. Issue notice. 5. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for respondents. 6. Having heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties, this Court directs the competent authority to treat the present petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same by within a period of six weeks from date, under intimation to the petitioner and this Court. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to approach this Court again, in case the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:08:52 need so arises, by way of filing a fresh writ petition. 8. In above terms, the present petition stands disposed of. 9. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026/zp VS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2026 at 12:08:52