2026:HHC:10892 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2607 of 2026 Decided on: 08.04.2026 Dr. Atul Bhardwaj …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for respondents-State. : Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has instructions to state that there is a station available where the petitioner can be accommodated and interest of justice would be served, in case, the petitioner is permitted to make such a representation and till decision on the representation, the petitioner is allowed to continue at the present place of posting. 2. In light of the prayer made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of without interfering with the impugned transfer order but with the observation that if the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:10892 petitioner files a representation for his adjustment within one week from today, appropriate decision thereupon be taken within a period of two weeks thereafter. Till decision on the representation, status quo qua the services of the petitioner as also the private respondent be maintained. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 08, 2026 (narender)