Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1820 (CAL)

PIYARI HANSDA v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16942/2025 · 2026-02-10

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.02.2026 Sl. No.30 10.02.2026 pp IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 16942 of 2025 Piyari Hansda Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Dilip Kumar Shymal, Mr. Debasis Dey, Ms. Sanchayita De …for the Petitioner. Ms. Mahuya Dutta Biswas ….for the State. 1. Mr. Debasis Dey, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has already been incorporated in the Pension Payment Order by the authority concerned. As such, the present writ petition has become infructuous. He files a copy of the Pension Payment Order dated 6th January, 2026, which is taken on record. 2. In view of such submission, the writ petition, being WPA 16942 of 2025 stands dismissed being infructuous. 3. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. 4. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 5. Urgent Photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of all necessary legal formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)