Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 182 (JK)

IFFCO TOKIO GEN.INS. COMPANY LTD. v. RENU MOZA AND OTHERS

RP/4/2026 · 2026-01-27

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 1 Supplementary Causelist HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU (Through Virtual Mode) RP 4/2026 IN [MA 115/2016] CM(225/2026) IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INS. COMPANY LTD. …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Advocate Vs. RENU MOZA AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ashfaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate (R-1 to 4) CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE. ORDER 27.01.2026 1. By this petition, petitioner herein is seeking review of the judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in MA No. 115/2016 titled “IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company ltd VS Renu Moza & Ors.” under Rule 66 of High Court Rules. 2. It is stated by Mr. Dewakar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner that the finding recorded at Para-8 of the judgment to the effect that the counsels for both the parties have agreed to an amicable settlement, is not as per the submissions being made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is further stated that, on the directions of this Court, petitioner herein had submitted the calculations, the same have been accepted by the learned counsel for the claimants & also by this Court in terms of judgment dated 16.12.2025. 3. Notice waived by Mr. Ashfaq Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 to 4. He states that he has no objection, if the judgment passed by this Court dated 16.12.2025 is reviewed to the extent, the consent for the amicable settlement on behalf of the parties, has been recorded at paragraph No. 8 of the said judgment. 4. Upon perusal of the said judgment, there is error apparent on the face of record with regard to Para-8, which is reproduced here asunder: “8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record, the counsel for the parties were put a specific question as to whether the parties are ready for some amicable settlement, to which they replied in affirmative.” 5. Therefore, Para-8 of the said judgment is modified and re-casted as under: “8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record.” 6. This Order shall form part of the judgment dated 16.12.2025. 7. Disposed of. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 27.01.2026 “Adil Ismail”