APHC010106582026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6046/2026 Between: 1. M. SHIVA SHANKARAPPA,, S/O. DALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-180, KAGGALLU VILLAGE, HINDUPUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 2. CHIRANJIVI,, S/O. LATE NARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.13-15-161, CHAKALI KUNTA, HINDUPUR MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3. K. NAGARAJU,, S/O. LATE NARASIMHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.3-21, KONAPURAM, MODA VILLAGE, HINDUPUR MANDAL SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522238 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.- 515134 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HINDUPUR I TOWN POLICE STATION, HINDUPUR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.-515201 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HINDUPUR I TOWN POLICE STATION, HINDUPUR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.-51521 5. THE TAHSILDAR, HINDUPUR, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.-515201 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KARRI DURGA VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: <…to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of respondents no.2 to 4 in resorting to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands in Sy.No.105-2 (Old S.No.622) having an extent of Ac.3-57 cents out of Ac.6-85 cents and S.No.106-4B having an extent of Ac.2-96 cents out of Ac.3-57 cents of Sreekantapuram Village, Hindupur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District without having any jurisdiction is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents no.2 to 4 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners aforesaid land…= 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr.K.Durga Venkata Prasad, learned counsel for the Petitioners, submits that the Respondents are unnecessarily attempting to dispossess the Petitioners from the disputed lands. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the followers of the Petitioners have indulged in trespass and damaged the boundary stones of the disputed land. Therefore, the police registered a case in Crime No.142 of 2025 on the file of Hindupur I Town Police Station on 24.06.2025 under Sections 329(3) and 324(4) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 1, and the same is under investigation. It is further submitted that, on receipt of a <Dial 100= call from the 1 >the B.N.S.,? 3 unofficial respondents, the police visited the scene and issued strict instructions to both parties not to engage in any altercations. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondents not to dispossess the Petitioners from their respective lands in Sy.No.105-2 (Old Sy.No.622) admeasuring Ac.3-57 cents out of Ac.6-85 cents and Sy.No.106-4B admeasuring Ac.2-96 cents out of Ac.3-57 cents of Sreekantapuram Village, Hindupur Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District, without following due process of law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 03.03.2026 PRA 4 26 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 6046 of 2026 Date: 03.03.2026 PRA