Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18193 (RAJ)

SIR CHOTU RAM HOSPITAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10303/2025 · 2026-02-12

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6884] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10303/2025 Sir Chotu Ram Hospital, Through Its Director Dr. Ajay Singh Shekhawat S/o Bajrang Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of 6/53, Opp. Jaipur Hospital, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur 302016 Rj ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan State Health Assurance Agency, Department Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Rtdc (Old Headquarter) Ground Floor, Opposite Jaipur Railway Station, Jaipur-302006 Through Its Joint Chief Executive Officer (Jceo) 3. Chairman-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Hsgrc, Rajasthan State Health Assurance Agency, Rtdc (Old Headquarter) Ground Floor, Opposite Jaipur Railway Station, Jaipur 4. Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, And Chairman (Appellate Authority), Rajasthan State Health Assurance Agency, Rtdc (Old Headquarter) Ground Floor, Opposite Jaipur Railway Station, Jaipur 5. New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Regional Government Business Office, Office Code 880000, Sethi Colony, Jaipur- 302004 Through Its Manager ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prateek Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishipal Agarwal for insurance company Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/02/2026 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner made a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner on 21.02.2025 and 30.04.2025. [2026:RJ-JP:6884] (2 of 2) [CW-10303/2025] Learned counsels appearing for the respondents submits that since they are not received factual report from the Department and therefore, they are not in a position to say that whether the petitioner actually served the representations as stated above. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the Court deems just and proper to direct the petitioner to make afresh representation with all his credentials as regards the grievance raised in the present writ petition to the competent respondents-authorities No.3 and 5 within a period of ten days from today. In case, the respondents receive the representation of the petitioner, they shall consider and decide the same within a period of 30 days thereafter by reasoned and speaking order. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. In view of the order passed in the main petition, the stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /164