[2026:RJ-JP:2416] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.637/2024 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3331/2001 Narain S/o Ganpat Bhat, R/o Ransar died through Kam Mukam Ramkuwar S/o Narain Bhat, aged about 70 years, R/o Ransar Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Harsh Nehra, Collector, Neem Ka Thana. 2. Shri Mahesh Ola, Tehsildar, Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana. 3. Shri Boduram S/o Kanhaiyalal, R/o Ransar Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana. 4. Shri Prahladram S/o Kanhaiyalal, R/o Ransar Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana. 5. Rohitash S/o Prabhulal, R/o Ransar Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana. 6. Ranglal S/o Sonaram, R/o Ransar Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana. 7. State of Rajasthan through Collector Harsh Nehra, Collector, Neem Ka Thana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/01/2026 1. Even in the second round, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:2416] (2 of 2) [CCP-637/2024] 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.3, 4, 5 & 6 submitted that in the present petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance of order dated 15.04.2008 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3331/2001. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents indicates that as per Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short, 'the Act of 1971'), contempt petition can be filed only within a period of one year from the date of alleged contempt. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents also submits that the entire contempt petition is silent and vague with regard to accrual of any cause of action rather it has been stated in the petition that since 15.04.2008, compliance has not been made. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions as well as in the light of provisions of Section 20 of the Act of 1971, where the contempt petition has been filed beyond the limitation of one year, the same is dismissed being time barred. However, dismissal of the contempt petition shall not prejudice any other rights of the respondents available under any law. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/13