Ashwani Kumar @ Chunnu Singh @ Ashwani Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./11196/2026 · 2026-06-17
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18190 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18190 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11196 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- Pura police station District- Gaya ======================================================
1. Ashwani Kumar @ Chunnu Singh @ Ashwani Kumar Singh S/O Jayshree Singh R/O Village- Alalpur, P.S- Pura, Dis.- Gaya.
2. Avinash Kumar @ Tinku Singh @ Avinash Kumar Singh S/O Jayshree Singh R/O Village- Alalpur, P.S- Pura, Dis.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Arunay Sahi, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 6 17-06-2026 Heard Mr. Arunay Sahi, learned counsel for the petitioner, the State as also the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Pura P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 for the offence registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/352/351(2)/75/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lodged on 11.10.2025 by the informant, Rupa Kumari.
3. As per the prosecution story, the lady alleged that the accused persons used to dump bricks in her drain regularly and when this was opposed by her husband, was brutally assaulted till he suffered serious injuries. They also tried to outrage her modesty as also injured her mother-in-law, this led
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11196 of 2026(6) dt.17-06-2026 2/2 to the husband being shifted to Tekari Hospital in serious condition, then to Gaya Hospital and finally to Patna. Accordingly, the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that there is case and counter case, both sides have suffered injuries, are neighbors and have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for the informant on the other hand has taken this court to the injury report of the husband of the informant to show that most of the injuries have been found to be grievous in nature. To show that the injury inflicted, the injury no.1 which has been recorded as fracture involving left frontal bone and bilateral sinus with communition of the fracture fragments have been found to be grievous in nature.
6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the allegation that has come against the petitioner and the injury report, no relief can be extended.
7. The Anticipatory Bail application stands rejected.
Vijay Singh/Munindra Kumar sahu (Rajiv Roy, J) U T