PREM SINGH S/O LATE SHRI SHERSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11893/2020 · 2026-02-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18183 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18183 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:7539] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11893/2020 Prem Singh S/o Late Shri Shersingh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village And Post Kasot, Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Nehru Sahkar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Rajasthan Rajya Sahkari Upbhokhta Sangh Limited (Confed), Through Managing Director, Room No. 237, 2Nd Floor, Nehru Sahkar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Singhal with Ms. Saroj Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nikhil Simlote Mr. Saleem Khan Mr. Hansraj Kuldeep, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/02/2026
1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:-
"i) The impugned E-tender notice order dated 30.07.2020 and consequential, decision to engage placement agency may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) That further the order dated 23.09.2020 (Annexure- 4) by which the services have been sought to be handed over the placement agency may also be quashed and set aside in the interest of justice. iii) Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and
[2026:RJ-JP:7539] (2 of 2) [CW-11893/2020] circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the petitioner. iv) Cost of the litigation may kindly be granted to the petitioner."
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3 submits that the petitioner is engaged through a Human Resource Service Provider and whatever be the capacity of the petitioner in employment, the respondent No.3 is not removing the petitioner and same statement is made by him on 05.10.2020.
3. Having taken note of the statement dated 05.10.2020 and also today, the writ petition is disposed with direction to the respondent No.3 not to remove services of the petitioner except in accordance with Rules as prevailing upon the petitioner.
4. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed with pending application, if any.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/4