1 2026:CGHC:13498 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2554 of 2026 1 - Ankita Dewangan W/o Pradeep Dewangan Aged About 39 Years Working As Assistant Grade 3, Office Of Deputy Director, Department Of Panchayat, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Department Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Deputy Director Department Of Panchayat, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Block Bilha, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy.G.A. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 20/03/2026. 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records of the case from the respondents. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 09.03.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Respondent No.4. 10.3 Any other relief or relief (s) which this Hon’ble Court may think proper in view of the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be granted.” 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent order passed by the Director, Panchyat Chhattisgarh Raipur dated 18.03.2026, whereby petitioner after promotion has been posted at office of Deputy Director, Panchayat, Bilaspur as such, the order Annexure P-1, which is an order of attachment, has lost its efficacy, therefore, at this stage, petitioner is not pressing this petition.. 3. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, petitioner will be at liberty to file appropriate proceedings if any cause of action arise in future. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram