Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18182 (AP)

DANDU RATNAVATHI v. DANDU APPALA NARASAMMA

WA/322/2026 · 2026-03-29

Challa Gunaranjan, Dhiraj Singh Thakur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010104952026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 322 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:-42 [3552] Dandu Ratnavathi and Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. Dandu Appala Narasamma and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Appellant: Mr. Yallabandi Ramatirtha Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. Rambabu Koppineedi, Mr. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 30th March 2026 P C : Writ Petition No.33625 of 2025 came to be disposed of by virtue of the judgment and order impugned, dated 03.12.2025, with a direction to the official respondents to follow due process of law by issuing a proper notice, calling for explanation, and affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard. This was done on the allegation that the petitioner was sought to be evicted from the possession of the fish tank in R.S. No.155/2 to an extent of Ac.2.05 cents situate in Navuduru Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 2 HCJ & CGR, J W.A. No:322 of 2026 2. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the appellants also have a stake in the aforementioned property, which is a fish tank, and is jointly owned by the appellants as also the petitioner and therefore, in case any steps were to be taken by the official respondents to evict the petitioner apart from them, the appellants also are required to be heard in the matter. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the appellants also being heard in the matter before any eviction proceedings are initiated by the official respondents from the property in question. 4. Be that as it may, we allow the present writ appeal and direct that in case any eviction proceedings are initiated against the petitioner in W.P. No.33625 of 2025, the appellants be also heard in the matter by giving them an appropriate notice and considering their explanation. The order impugned is modified accordingly. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J akn 3 HCJ & CGR, J W.A. No:322 of 2026 HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Writ Appeal No:322 of 2026 DATE : 30.03.2026 AKN 28