Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18180 (AP)

L MOHAN BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5906/2026 · 2026-03-04

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5906 of 2026 Dated 05.03.2026 APHC010105532026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5906/2026 Between: 1. L MOHAN BABU, S/O. LATE LINGAPPA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O. BC COLONY, KANGUNDHI VILLAGE KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517001 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KUPPAM POLICE STATION KUPPAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR, KUPPAM POLICE STATION KUPPAM MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 6. THE TAHSILDAR KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 7. CHAN BASHA, S/O LATE MOHAMED SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O. MG PHOTO STUDIO, 0PP.POLICE STATION, NETHAJI ROAD, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517425 8. M GHOUSE, S/O LATE MOHAMED SAB AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS R/O. MG PHOTO STUDIO, 0PP.POLICE STATION, 2 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5906 of 2026 Dated 05.03.2026 NETHAJI ROAD, KUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 517425 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondents No.4 to 6 in interfering with petitioner personal life and liberty by calling the petitioner to their offices and pressurizing petitioner to get settled the disputes with the respondents No.7 and 8 with regard to the house property belongs to petitioner in house plot at Door.No.1-128 in Sy.No. 130/2 of BC.Colony, Kangundhi Village, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District and threatening petitioner to hand over the same to the respondents No.7 and 8 as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and voilative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.4 to 6 not to interfere with petitioner personal life and liberty by calling the petitioner to their offices and pass….” 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government. 3. Ms. S. Parineeta, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that respondent Nos. 4 to 6 have been repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing him to settle the disputes with respondent Nos. 7 and 8 with regard to his house property in Survey No. 130/2 of B.C. Colony, 3 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5906 of 2026 Dated 05.03.2026 Kangundhi Village, Kuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, and to hand over the same to them. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that respondent No. 8 approached respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and made an oral complaint against the petitioner in respect of the subject property. They informed him that the matter is pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kuppam, and advised him to attend the court proceedings. It is further submitted that they have never summoned or called any person to Kuppam Urban Police Station in connection with this matter. 5. Considering the above submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos. 4 to 6 not to call the petitioner henceforth at the behest of respondent Nos. 7 and 8 in connection with the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 7 and 8. However, if any crime is registered against the petitioner, the police are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 05.03.2026 PBS 4 Dr. YLR, J W.P.No.5906 of 2026 Dated 05.03.2026 245 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5906 of 2026 Date: 05.03.2026 PBS