Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1818 (JHR)

BADAL SAH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6028/2025 · 2026-02-02

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2587 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.6028 of 2025 Badal Sah, aged about 34 years, son of Binod Sah, resident of Village: Harindanga (Tantipara Road), Near Sutan Bagan, PO: Pakur, PS: Pakur (Nagar), District-Pakur …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Achinto Sen, APP ------ 2/02.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.43 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(1), 191(3), 190, 303(2), 331(4), 324(4) 74 and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is falsely implicated in this case and there are case and counter case. He also submits that the allegations of firing are there against Sumanto Das and Milan Mandal. He then submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in para-19 of the petition. He next submits that the other identical co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6579 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that petitioner is not co-operating in the investigation. 5. Looking into the FIR, it transpires that the there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner, the allegations of firing are 2026:JHHC:2587 2 there against Sumanto Das and Milan Mandal, petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in para-19 of the petition and other identical co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in aforesaid ABA, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.43 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 02.02.2026 R.Kumar