Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18178 (PNJ)

ROHTASH v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS

CWP/15181/2026 · 2026-05-15

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15181-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 ROHTASH ...Petitioner Versus DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND OTHERS …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present : Mr. Ankur Goyat, Advocate and Ms. Aditi Singh Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent-DHBVNL JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of LL-1 checking report dated 13.05.2022. He is also seeking setting aside of notice dated 17.05.2022 whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.1,97,687/- as well as compounding charges of Rs.35,000/-. He is also seeking setting aside of demand order dated 06.02.2026 as well as seeking restoration of electricity connection. GURPREET KAUR 2026.05.15 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-15181-2026 (O&M) -2- 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that petition may be disposed of in terms of judgment of this Court in “Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.”, Law Finder Doc ID #2869383. 3. Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra). Before proceeding against petitioner in terms of the afore-said judgment, the respondent shall restore petitioner’s electricity supply. 4. Pending Misc. Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. May 15, 2026 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] gurpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No GURPREET KAUR 2026.05.15 17:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document