AADINATH DNYANOBA KADAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
BA/1822/2026 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18177 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18177 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
967-BA-1816-26+2.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1816 OF 2026 Sonu @ Vishwnath Dilip Kadam ..APPLICANT VERSUS State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1822 OF 2026 Aadinath Dnyanoba Kadam ..APPLICANT VERSUS State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1873 OF 2026 Rutik Vilas Ingle ..APPLICANT VERSUS State of Maharashtra ..RESPONDENT .... Mr. S.G. Ghongade, Advocate for applicant in BA/1816/26 Mr. M.K. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant in BA/1822/26 Mr. A.G. Jadhav, Advocate for applicant in BA/1873/26 Mrs. A.S. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for respondent - State ....
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATE : 07th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT :
1. After showing disinclination, learned counsel for the applicants seek leave to withdraw the applications with liberty to file fresh applications before the learned Trial Court after filing of the charge-sheet.
2. Leave is granted. All the bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty as prayed is granted. In case fresh applications are filed 1 / 2 2026:BHC-AUG:47735
967-BA-1816-26+2.odt by the applicants after filing of the charge-sheet, same be decided by the learned Trial Court on their own merits.
( HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. ) SSD 2 / 2