Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18176 (RAJ)

SMT. SATWANT KAUR W/O SHRI RAJ SINGH D/O SHRI DESHRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

WMAP/234/2024 · 2026-01-23

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3182] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No.234/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.117311/2015 Smt. Satwant Kaur W/o Shri Raj Singh D/o Shri Deshram, Aged About 69 Years, R/o House No. 33/2, New Colony North, Luharu Road, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Elementary Education Department, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 2. Dy. Director, Elementary Education, Churu, Rajasthan. 3. District Education Officer, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. 4. The Commissioner, Secondary/ Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 5. The Director, Elementary Education Parishad, Jaipur. 6. Dy. Director, Secondary, Education, Churu. 7. Block Elementry Education Officer, Panchyat Samiti Surajgarh, District, Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Smt. Pankaj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG with Mr. S.M. Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Sharma and Ms. Pooja Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 23/01/2026 1. The instant writ misc. application has been submitted with the following prayer: “It is therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may most graciously be pleased [2026:RJ-JP:3182] (2 of 2) [WMAP-234/2024] to accept and allow this Civil Misc. Application and be issued directions to the respondents to make compliance of the Hon’ble Court order dated 06.04.2023 (Annex-1) passed in S.B. Writ Petition No.17311/2015 to titled as Smt. Satwant Kaur V/s State of Rajasthan & Ors. and also be issued directions to take necessary legal action against respondents for non-compliance of the said Hon’ble Curt order and be pleased to initiate the proceedings of contempts against respondents.” 2. By way of filing the instant misc. application, the petitioner has made a prayer for issuing directions to the respondents to make compliance of the order dated 06.04.2023 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17311/2015 and a further prayer has been made for taking necessary legal action against the respondents for non-compliance of the aforesaid order and contempt proceedings be also initiated against him. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the relief sought for, cannot be granted by this Court while deciding the instant misc. application. For that purpose, the petitioner is supposed to file a contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act/ under Article 215 of the Constitution of India. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ misc. application stands disposed of with liberty to file contempt petition along with an application under Section 5/14 of the Limitation Act. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/17