Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18173 (BOM)

BASAVRAJ VISHWANATHAPPA CHIVDE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/4212/2023 · 2026-10-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

968-CA-4212-2023.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 968 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4212 OF 2023 Basavraj Vishwanathappa Chivde And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. R. P. Cheble h/f Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for Respondent No. 1 Mr. R. B. Narwade Patil, for Respondent No. 2 CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J DATE :OCTOBER 09, 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned Counsels for both sides, on instruction, make statement that the parties have settled the dispute and terms of compromise are already placed on record. 2. Learned APP opposed application. 3. The record also indicates that learned Registrar (Judicial) has verified the terms of compromise so also compromise arrived at between the parties on their free will. Learned Counsel for Informant on the basis of compromise records no objection for allowing application. 4. Considering the facts that this is a matrimonial dispute and parties have settled the same, application deserves to be allowed. 5. In view of above, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and ‘B-1’, ‘B-2’ and ‘B-3’. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani 2026:BHC-AUG:48236-DB