[2026:RJ-JP:3234] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11432/2022 Sonu Choudhary S/o Shri Badri Lal Jat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Nala Post Khandwa, Tehsil Niwai District Tonk Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Inspector General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 4. The Inspector General Police, Rac (Chairman Selection Board), Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 5. The Commandant, 9Th Battalion, Rac, Tonk (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 23/01/2026 1. Application Nos.1/2025 and 1/2026 filed for early listing stands disposed. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “a) By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof inaction of the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to consider candidature of the petitioner and give appointment as Constable in 9th Battalion RAC Tonk under OBC category being positioned at [2026:RJ-JP:3234] (2 of 2) [CW-11432/2022] No.2 in the List after cancellation of appointment and demise of candidate Deenal Dayal Choudhary positioned at No.1, at par with other similarly appointee and with all consequential benefits. b) Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/37