Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18171 (AP)

Gudimetla Manoj Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6066/2026 · 2026-03-04

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010104852026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 6066/2026 Between: 1. GUDIMETLA MANOJ REDDY,, S/O PRABHAKARA REDDY, AGE 29 YEARS, OCC FORMER COMPUTER ASSISTANT PACS ALAMURU, R/O. DOOR NO. 2-204, GUDIMETLAVARI STREET, ALAMURU, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SYAMALA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522006 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT BHIMAVARAM-534201 4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT- 534201 5. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 2 BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534201 6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., MARTERU, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534122 7. THE PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, ALAMURU, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ALAMURU VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-53412 6 8. MANGINA NAGA VISHNUVU, S/O. V. K. RAMA RAO AGE 59 YEARS, OCC CEO OF ALAMUR PACS, ALAMURU, R/O. ALAMURU VILLAGE, PENUMANTRA MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534126 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 2 to 6 in not considering the petitioners representation dated 27.11.2025 submitted for taking necessary action with respect to the fake date of births certificates furnished by the 8th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, capricious, violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16, 19(1)(c), 21 and 43B of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the A. P. Co-Operative Societies Act, 1964 and the A. P. Co-Operative Societies Rules, 1964 and consequentially direct the respondent no. 2 to 6 to consider the petitioners representation dated. 27.11.2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 to 6 to take action against the 8th respondent basing oh the 3 petitioner’s representation dated 27.11.2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PENUMAKA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR COOPERATION 3. SRINIVAS BASAVA The Court made the following: 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.6066 OF 2026 O R D E R: This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondent Nos.2 to 6 in not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 27.11.2025 for taking action against Respondent No.8 with regard to furnishing fake date of birth certificate, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Sri Srinivas Basava, learned counsel takes notice for Respondent No.7. 3. Learned Government Pleader on instructions, submitted that the representation of the Petitioner was examined and action was taken thereon and a reply was given to the Petitioner through his counsel by the District Cooperative Officer, West-Godavari District, Bhimavaram vide Rc.No.1067/2025-B, dated 06.12.2025. A copy of the letter is also passed on to this Court. 4. In that view, as the grievance of the Petitioner is addressed, no further orders are required to be passed, and accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 5 As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 05.03.2026 chs 6 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 104 W.P. No.6066 of 2026 Date: 05.03.2026 chs