IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.958 of 2026 Date of decision:31.07.2026 Surjeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus Er.Anju Sharma ...Respondent Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): The present petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 2322 of 2026, decided on 3rd March 2026. 2. This Court had issued notice to the respondent on 30th July, 2026. Today, the learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record the office order dated 29.07.2026, whereby the representation, as filed by the present petitioner, has been considered and partly allowed. 3. The said fact is duly acknowledged by the learned vice counsel for the petitioner and submits that for the redressal of Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- remaining grievances, the petitioner may be given liberty to assail the said order before the appropriate Court of law. 4. Consequently, the present petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for, along with pending application(s), if any. Notice discharged. (Romesh Verma) Judge 31st July, 2026. (vt)