MAFIJUL HAQUE@MOFIJUL HAQUE@MAFIJUL HOCK v. THE STATE OF WEST BENNGAL
CRM(NDPS)/673/2025 · 2026-03-17
Debangsu Basak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18169 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18169 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17.03.2026 Serial no. 24 [Dd] (Bail Rejected)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
CRM(NDPS)/673/2025
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Phansidewa Police Station Case No. 11 of 2025 dated 07.01.2025 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
-And-
In the matter of : MAFIJUL HAQUE@MOFIJUL
HAQUE@MAFIJUL HOCK
… …Petitioner
Mr. Arijit Ghosh, Advocate
… … For the Petitioner
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Mr. Aniruddha Biswas, Advocates … …For the State
1. Period of detention is canvassed a ground for the grant of bail.
2. Petitioner is apparently in custody for 430 days. Charge sheet was submitted on June 13, 2025. Co-accused is still absconding. It is contended that the possibility of the trial commencing any time soon does not exist.
3. State is represented.
4. 78.39 kgs of ganja was seized from the joint possession of the petitioner.
5. Petitioner is unable to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
6. So far as the ground under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is concerned, I find that, charge sheet was submitted on June 13, 2025. Period of custody taken in consideration with the gravity of the offence is not such that, the
2 petitioner should be enlarged on bail on the ground of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
7. In such circumstances, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
8. CRM(NDPS)/673/2025 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)