2026:HHC:31736 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA COPC No. 960/2026 Decided on: 30.07.2026 Baldev Ram Raghuwanshi …..Petitioner Versus Dr. Surinder Kumar Vashisht ….Respondent ______________________________________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) Notice. Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice. 2 The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order, dated 29.5.2026, as passed by this Court in CMP No. 6935/2026 in CWP No. 10808/2023. 3 Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on record copy of office order, dated 2.7.2026, whereby representation of the petitioner has been rejected. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 4 Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted liberty to challenge the aforesaid office order before the competent Court of law. 5 In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty, as aforesaid. Notice is discharged. (Romesh Verma) 30.07.2026 Judge (pankaj)