1 2026:CGHC:10235 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2131 of 2026 Rajeewa Lochan Trivedi S/o Shri R.D. Trivedi Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No.16, Premabag, Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Under Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector Koriya, District - Koriya ( Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. 4 - The District Education Officer Koriya Baikunthpur, District - Koriya ( Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Block Education Officer Koriya Baikunthpur, District - Koriya ( Baikunthpur), Chhattisgarh. 6 - Principal Government Model Higher Secondary School Baikunthpur, District - Koriya, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Akanksha Jain, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE PARTH PRATEEM SAHU) Order on Board 27/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs: “A. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, 2 thereby directing the respondent authorities to release the salary of the petitioner for the period from 18.10.2022 to 05.09.2023 with interest and all the consequential benefits; E. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in favour of the petitioner may kindly be passed” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner while in service was not paid salary for the period from 18.10.2022 to 05.09.2023, against which the petitioner had submitted representation before respondent No. 4 and 6 on 05.03.2025 which till date is pending consideration, therefore, direction be issued to respondent No. 4 and 6 to take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner, at the earliest, within specified time frame. 3. Counsel for the State submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to respondent No. 4 and 6 to take decision on the representation, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for parties, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No. 4 and 6 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. With the aforesaid observations and direction, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Saurabh