Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1816 (RAJ)

RAJKUMAR URF RAJU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2991/2026 · 2026-03-27

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2991/2026 1. Rajkumar @ Raju S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 10, Pansariyo Ka Mohalla P.S. Nainwa, District-Bundi, Rajasthan. (At present confined in Sub-Jail, Nainwa, Distt. Bundi) 2. Navneet @ Nikki S/o Kishan Gopal, Aged About 27 years, R/o Bamagaon, P.S. Nainwa, District-Bundi, Rajasthan. (At present confined in Sub-Jail, Nainwa, Distt. Bundi) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Zakir Hussain with Mr. Zaid Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar, PP Mr. Vikas Jain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/03/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioners in connection with the impugned FIR No. 349/2025 registered with the Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi, for the offences punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 110/49, 112, & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not the assailant in the instant case and the accused persons who assaulted the injured-Omprakash have already been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submits that none of the injuries sustained by the injured-Omprakash were found to be grievous [2026:RJ-JP:12949] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2991/2026] and dangerous to life. Counsel submits that the petitioners are in custody since 09.02.2026 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant opposed the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioners and submitted that the petitioners have hatched a conspiracy to commit murder of the injured-Omprakash and they have hired co-accused persons who assaulted the injured-Omprakash. Counsel further submits that the petitioners are the real and main culprits in the instant case, hence, they do not deserve indulgence of bail. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the injured-Omprakash has not sustained any injury which is found to be grievous and dangerous to life and the petitioners are in custody since 09.02.2026 and the trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the accused-petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Rajkumar @ Raju S/o Mohan Lal and Navneet @ Nikki S/o Kishan Gopal arrested in connection with the aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two surety bonds of [2026:RJ-JP:12949] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2991/2026] Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all the dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/22