VIJAYSINGH RAMSINGH PATIL AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/188/2014 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18158 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18158 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
906 & 907 cp 187-14 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONT. PETITION NO. 187 OF 2014 IN WP/3927/2013 SANJAY BHIMRAO NIMBALKAR VERSUS NARAYAN DRUPATRAO GADHEKAR AND OTHERS ... Ms. Renuka Pawar h/f Mr. Patil Vinod Prakash, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State …. AND 907 CONT. PETITION NO. 188 OF 2014 IN WP/8378/2013 VIJAYSINGH RAMSINGH PATIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Ms. Renuka Pawar h/f Patil Vinod Prakash, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State ….
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 08/10/2026 PER COURT :
Learned counsel holding for Mr. Patil, on instructions, submits that the orders passed in the contempt proceedings have been duly complied with in both these petitions. In view of the same, both these petitions stand disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47637-DB