Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18155 (AP)

J.Nagaraju v. The Rayalaseema University

WP/6047/2021 · 2026-02-17

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010106632021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 6047/2021 Between: 1. J.NAGARAJU, S/O. VENKATESHWARLU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. KATIKA STREET, C. BELGAL, POLAKAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. K.DAMODAR REDDY, S/O. BHASKAR REDDY, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC.STUDENT, R/O. 1-31, 0.C.COLONY, JULAKALLU VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE RAYALASEEMA UNIVERSITY, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 2. THE PRINCIPAL, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, RAYALASEEMA UNIVERSITY, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION, SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE, G-7, SECTOR - 10, DWARAKA, NEAR METRO STATION, NEW DELHI. REP. BY ITS REGIONAL DIRECTOR (SRC) 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not providing admissions for M.Ed. course in the 2nd respondent college even in spite of 2nd respondent college is having all facilities to getting admission of the students in to the M.Ed. course as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to continue the M.Ed. course in the 2nd respondent college by complying with the necessary queries raised by the 3rd respondent in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide admissions to the course of M.Ed. in the 2nd respondent college for the academic year 2020-21 pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice . Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S APPADHARA REDDY 2. HARINATH N (Asst Solicitor General) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.6047 OF 2021 O R D E R: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not providing admissions to M.Ed. course in Respondent No.2/College, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. It is represented by the learned counsel for the Petitioners that no cause of action survives in the Writ Petition in view of the passage of time. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date :18.02.2026 chs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 187 WRIT PETITION No. 6047 of 2021 Date : 18.02.2026 chs