SADDAM HUSSAIN ALIAS DANA SADDAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4097/2026 · 2026-06-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18154 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18154 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:18938] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4097 of 2026
------ Saddam Hussain @ Dana Saddam, Aged about 27 years, S/o- Nabi Hussain, R/o- Rahmat Nagar, Kapali P.O.- Dangardih, P.S.- Kapali, Dist- East Singhbhum .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Sinha (4), Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.03 Dated-29-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.57 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.309 of 2025 (S) (S.T. Case No.41 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 329 (3), 308 (3), 109, 324 (4), 311 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25 (1-B)a, 27, 35 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner demanded extortion of Rs.20,000/- from the medical shop of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade as has been mentioned in para-3 of the Supplementary Affidavit, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is also submitted that the co- accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.02.2026 passed in B.A. No.11177 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.10.2025 as
has been mentioned in para-07 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandil in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.57 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.309 of 2025 (S) (S.T. Case No.41 of 2026) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-29.06.2026-Animesh/