Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18150 (JHR)

MUKUL BHAGAT @ MUKUL KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3399/2026 · 2026-06-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18791 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3399 of 2026 1. Mukul Bhagat @ Mukul Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Raj Kuamr Bhagat, resident of IM Type, Main Road, Private House, P.O. Sindri, P.S. Baliapur, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand 2. Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kr. Mishra, aged about 31 years, son of Bharat Mishra, resident of Electricity Colony, P.O. BIT, P.S. Sindri, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. 02/ 29.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 118(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned J.M. Ist Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are resident of same locality and there are previous enmity between them for that false allegations have been made. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegations of assault. He further submits that specific allegation of assault is against Rohit Kumar pursuant to which one injury is there as alleged. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault and snatching of money are there. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R, it transpires that allegations of assault are there against Rohit Kumar who is not petitioner in the present anticipatory bail application. Further it has been pointed out that due to ( 2026:JHHC:18791 ) previous enmity the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M. Ist Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Sindri P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.29.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-