Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18150 (CHH)

KRISHNA JEEVAN MISHRA (IN PERSON) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WA/192/2026 · 2026-02-26

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:10156-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 192 of 2026 Krishna Jeevan Mishra S/o Mukta Nand Mishra, Aged About 49 Years R/o Near Pani Tanki, Dasvisa, Anore, Goverdhan Chhata, Mathura- Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh ...Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Electronics And Information Technology, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (Chips) Through Chief Executive Officer, Having Their Office At- 4th Floor, State Data Centre Building, New Circuit House, Civil Lines, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 3 - Joint Chief Executive Officer (Pariyojana) Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (Chips), 4th Floor, State Data Centre Building, Civil Line, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr.Krishna Jeevan Mishra in person For Respondent No.1-State For Respondents No.2 and 3 : : Mr.P.K.Bhaduri, Deputy Advocate General Mr.R.K.Kesharwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.02.28 10:23:32 +0530 2 Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 27.02.2026 1. Heard the petitioner, Mr. Krishna Jeevan Mishra, appearing in person, as well as Mr. P.K. Bhaduri, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for respondent No. 1/State and Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 2 and 3. 2. The appellant has filed this writ appeal against the order dated 19.01.2026 passed in WPS No. 303/2026. The matter is still sub judice before the learned Single Judge. 3. The petitioner, appearing in person, submits that his services have been terminated by the order which is the subject matter before the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 303/2026, and states that no interim order has been passed therein. 4. In view of the above, we deem it proper to request the learned Single Judge to dispose of the said writ petition expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of its listing. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ appeal stands disposed of. No costs. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu