Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18148 (JHR)

MANJUR SHEIKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5835/2026 · 2026-06-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18874 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5835 of 2026 ------ Manjur Sheikh, son of Md Sahabuddin Shekh, aged about 34 years, resident of Village-Ramnagar Garh, P.O. + P.S.-Mahuda, Dist.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 29-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nawadih P. S. case no. 62 of 2024 instituted under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused committed dacoity and looted silver and gold ornaments as well as cash from the dwelling house of the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on TIP, as mentioned in para-10 of the Bail Application, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that charge has also been framed but no witness has been examined in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 24.02.2026, as mentioned in para-06 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 14.05.2026 in B.A. No. 4061 of 2026. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge- I, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Nawadih P. S. case no. 62 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case or the victim or their family members in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 29/06/2026 Abhiraj/