Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18147 (JHR)

DARSHAN SINGH ALIAS SHOURYA DARSHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3435/2026 · 2026-06-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18880 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3435 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3435 of 2026 ---- 1. Darshan Singh @ Shourya Darshan, aged about 18 years, S/o Birendra Ray, r/o Q. No.1330, Sector XII/E, PO and PS – Sector XII, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand 2. Samar Singh @ Samar Bharti, aged about 18 years, S/o Ramesh Kumar Paswan, R/o village – Tulsiyahi, PO and PS – Gobraura, Chandar, District – Madhubani, Bihar, presently R/o Sector XII/D, B.S. City, PO and PS – Sector – XII, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Advocate ---- 02/29.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sector - XII P.S. Case No.13 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are students of Class-XI and they have appeared in Class-X examination in light of admit card annexed as Annexure-2 series. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault upon the son of the informant. He then submits that the son of the informant and the petitioners are friends and for some dispute the altercation took place between them. He next submits that the 2026:JHHC:18880 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3435 of 2026 petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.11 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault are there. 5. Considering that the son of the informant and the petitioners are friends and due to some dispute, the altercation took place between them and there are general and omnibus allegation and further the petitioners are students and they are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.11 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro in connection with Sector - XII P.S. Case No.13 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 29.06.2026 Sangam/