LAXMAN MAROTI TURUKMANE v. VASANTRAO DATTATRAYA DESHMUKH AND OTHER
CP/149/2019 · 2026-10-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18145 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18145 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
908 cp 149-19 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 CONT. PETITION NO. 149 OF 2019 IN LPA/58/2010 LAXMAN MAROTI TURUKMANE VERSUS VASANTRAO DATTATRAYA DESHMUKH AND OTHER ... Mr. D. A. Karnik h/f Mr. Dhage Vivek J., Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State Mr. Shinde Dhananjay M., Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 ….
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 08/10/2026 PER COURT :
Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has placed on record a copy of the order dated 21/11/2013 passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, mentioning that the order under contempt has been set aside. The said order is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present petition. The petition accordingly stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47615-DB