Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18142 (JHR)

GUDDU PRAMANIK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3401/2026 · 2026-06-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18779 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3401 of 2026 Guddu Pramanik, aged about 38 years, son of Gorango Pramanik, resident of Udhwa Mohanpur, Post Office-Udhwa, Police Statation-Radhanagar, District-Sahebganj, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. 02/ 29.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Rajmahal. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner happens to be husband of Kanchan Devi and in the F.I.R allegation of pelting stone is against Kanchan Devi who has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 3396 of 2026. He next submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and altercation took place due to land dispute. He submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 11 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations of assault are there. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R, it transpires that allegation of pelting stone is against Kanchan Devi who happens to be wife of the petitioner and the said Kanchan Devi has been granted anticipatory bail in ( 2026:JHHC:18779 ) A.B.A. No. 3396 of 2026. There are case and counter case between the parties. The altercation took place due to land dispute and petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 11 of the petition. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Rajmahal, in connection with Radhanagar P.S. Case No. 02 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.29.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-