FAYAZ AHMAD TANTRAY v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS (SOCIAL WELFARE)
WP(C)/734/2024 · 2026-07-13
Sanjay Dhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1814 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1814 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 143 Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR ******* CM No. 3973/2026 in WP (C ) No. 734/2024 CM Nos. 1942/2024, 5213/2024.
FAYAZ AHMAD TANTRAY.
…Petitioner (s)
Through: Mr. Sheikh Manzoor, Advocate.
VERSUS
UT OF JK AND ORS.
Through: Mr. M. Younis Hafeez, Assisting Counsel.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 13-07-2026
CM No. 3973/2026 in WP (C ) no. 734/2024.
Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner has submitted that, in view of the assurance extended by the respondents that the grievance projected by the applicant/petitioner in the Writ petition shall be addressed, as such, the applicant/petitioner do not wish to pursue the present Writ petition. His statement is taken on record. In view of the above, the present application is allowed and the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one in case the cause survives.
The application stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 13-07-2026 Showkat Khan