Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18135 (JHR)

MANTU KUMAR SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3343/2026 · 2026-06-25

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18769 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3343 of 2026 ------ 1. Mantu Kumar Saw, aged about 36 years, S/o Rama Saw, R/o Village- Tipodih, PO- Gadisri Rampur, PS- Giridih (M), District- Giridih. 2. Ashok Kumar Saw, aged about 31 years, S/o Umashankar Saw, R/o Village – Yaspur, PO- Gadisri Rampur, PS- Giridih (M), District- Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kumar Chatterjee , A.P.P. ------ 02/25.06.2026. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Gandey (Giridih) P. S. Case No.05 of 2019, registered for the offence under Sections 413, 414, 467, 468, 471, 34 of Indian Penal Code and under Section 30 (ii) of Coal Mines Act and the case is pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that false allegations have been made against the petitioners of carrying about 2 quintals and 2.5 quintals of coal each in two different Motorcycles and that there is further allegation that they fled away. 4. He next submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para-9 of the instant petition. He also submits that the said coal was being carried for personal use. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that coal was being carried illegally on two motorcycles. 6. Considering that the said coal was being carried for personal use by the petitioners and that they have no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para-9 of the instant petition, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from the date 2026:JHHC:18769 2 of receipt of a copy of this order and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih, in connection with Gandey (Giridih) P. S. Case No.05 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 25.06.2026. Sandeep/ Uploaded/