Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18135 (DEL)

GULE RANA NIZAMI v. THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/13394/2026 · 2026-09-14

Amit Bansal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 13394/2026 $~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010433882026 + W.P.(C) 13394/2026 & CM APPL. 62296/2026 GULE RANA NIZAMI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Faisal Hameed, Advocate (through VC) versus THE COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocate for R-1 to 3/MCD. Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC for DDA with Mr. Apoorv Upamanyu, Mr. Ravikant Kumar and Mr. Vishal Sejwar, Advocates for STF. Mr. Kavinder Gill, SPC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, (GP), Advocate for R-5 & 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 14.09.2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent-MCD to take action against the property bearing no.58 wrongly mentioned as 58A, situated at Basti Hazrat Nizamuddin, Opp. Bara Khamba Complex New Delhi-110013 (‘subject property’). 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of the subject property and certain builder mafia have encroached upon his building and carried out unauthorized construction. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2026 at 12:54:19 W.P.(C) 13394/2026 3. A complaint has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with respondent-MCD on 31st July, 2026. 4. From the documents filed along with the petition, it is not certain that the petitioner is the owner of the subject property. 5. Photographs filed with the petition also are undated and do not reflect as to the date when the construction took place. Further, the petitioner has failed to implead the parties who are carrying out the construction in the subject property. 6. Mr. Kapil Dutta, counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-MCD submits that in any event, after following due process of law, a demolition order has been passed against the unauthorized construction in the subject property and partial demolition has been carried out on 4th August, 2026 and further action is planned for 15th September, 2026. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of while directing the respondent-MCD to take appropriate action in accordance with law. 8. All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owner/occupier shall remain protected. 9. Pending application stands disposed of. AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/09/2026 at 12:54:19