Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18133 (JHR)

SANJU DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3427/2026 · 2026-06-29

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18832 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3427 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3427 of 2026 ---- Sanju Das, aged about 28 years, son of Suresh Das, resident of village Sirsia, PO – Giridih, PS – Giridih (M), District – Giridih, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Sudhir Kr. Roy, Advocate ---- 02/29.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (Mahila) P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/4 of D.P. Act pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be husband and he is earning his livelihood by way of doing labour work out of the State. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the family members for demand of chain and motorcycle. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 2026:JHHC:18832 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3427 of 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposed the prayer and submits that allegation of demand of dowry are there and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. In the FIR itself it has been stated that the petitioner is residing out of the State and in the FIR there are general and omnibus allegation of demand of chain and motorcycle and it has been pointed out that the petitioner is a labourer and earns his livelihood by way of doing the labour work. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Giridih (Mahila) P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 29.06.2026 Sangam/