Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1813 (JHR)

TIKKI ALIAS SUNIL MISHRA ALIAS SUNIL SAHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/295/2026 · 2026-03-10

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6224-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A. (DB) No. 295 of 2026 -------- Tikki @ Sunil Mishra @ Sunil Sahu, aged about 21 years, son of Amit Sanatn Pal, resident of Salar, P.O. & P.S.-Nituria, District-Purulia, West Bengal, At present resident of Village-Jobra, P.O. & P.S.-Malgodam, District-Cuttuck, Odissa ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Appellant : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. -------- Order No. 02/ Dated: 10th March, 2026 I.A. No. 3362 of 2026 Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned P.P. 2. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 05 days in filling of the instant appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant interlocutory application, the same is allowed and the delay of 05 days in filling of this appeal is hereby condoned. 4. The aforesaid I.A. stands allowed and disposed of. Cr. A. (DB) No. 295 of 2026 5. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12.01.2026 passed in M.C.A. No. 51 of 2026, arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No.107 of 2024, by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XX, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 6. It has been alleged that the nine month old child of the informant 2026:JHHC:6224-DB 2 was stolen by some unnamed accused persons. 7. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the person from whom the child was recovered namely Suhana Begum has been granted bail in Cr. A. (DB) No. 1006 of 2024. It has further been submitted that the appellant is in custody since 19.05.2024 and one of the similarly situated co-accused namely Radha Sahu has been granted bail in Cr. A. (DB) No. 834 of 2025. 8. Learned P.P. though has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant but does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 9. Regard being had to the above, we while setting aside the order dated 12.01.2026 passed in M.C.A. No. 51 of 2026, arising out of Chutia P.S. Case No.107 of 2024, by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner- XX, Ranchi, direct the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XX, Ranchi. 10. Accordingly, this appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 10th March, 2026 Arpit Uploaded on 11/03/2026