1 APHC010125712026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7598/2026 Between: 1. JADALA GIRI VIJAYA KUMARI, REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER JADALA RAVI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, D.NO. 1-12- 26/3 TIRUMALASETTY VARI STREET, KONDAYYA PALEM, KAKINADA - 533003. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (MA AND UD) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 4. THE KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, KAKINADA URBAN, KAKINADA DISTRICT - 533001. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the in- action of the 3rd respondent having the received the representations dated 21.02.2026 and given acknowledgement, not exercising the su- moto powers by considering the representation and documentary evidence as filed along with the writ petition and directing the authorities concerned to mutate the name of the petitioner by regularizing the revenue records and other departmental records by perusing the petitioners vendors name as illegal, arbitrary, colorable exercise of powers and violation of the legal duty caste on him and violation of the Section 9 of the ROR Act, 1971 as well as violation of Article 14, 19(1 )(g) and 21 of the Constitution of the India and consequentially direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 21.02.2026 and direct his subordinates and other concerned officers to regularize the records in the name of the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the representation dated 21.02.2026 and direct his subordinates and other concerned officers to regularize the records in the name of the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T N M RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1, 3, 5 & 6. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 3rd respondent in not disposing of the representation of the petitioner dated 21.02.2026 in the matter of mutation of the name of the petitioner while regularizing the revenue records and other departmental records by perusing the petitioner’s vendor’s name. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 6th respondent dated 10.03.2026 submits that the request of the petitioner for mutation was not considered and endorsement was issued by the office of the 6th respondent in reference No.B/12/2026, dated 07.03.2026 informing that mutation of the said land is not possible. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances and recording the said instructions of the 6th respondent dated 10.03.2026, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved of the endorsement issued by the 6th respondent dated 07.03.2026, liberty is given to assail the same if so warranted and if so advised in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. The written instructions of the 6th respondent dated 10.03.2026 shall be made as 4 part of the court record. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 07.04.2026 NNN