HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17369 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that dispute of the petitioner is with private individuals i.e. respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and a writ petition is not maintainable for a private dispute. 3. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Chandra Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Avdhesh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad