BARNALI KARMAKAR (RAKSHIT) AND ORS. v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
CRR/422/2024 · 2026-03-19
Jay Sengupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18129 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18129 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
AD 76 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA March 19, 2026 Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Ct. 6 Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction SG
CRR 422 of 2024
Mr. Saikat Chatterjee
Mr. Chattu Roy
… for the State
No one appears on behalf of the petitioners although the State is represented. No accommodation is sought. On the last occasion, i.e., on 18.03.2026, no one represented the petitioners or prayed for any accommodation when the matter was called on for hearing. Accordingly, the revisional application is dismissed for default. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)