Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18129 (AP)

A. Srinivas Rao v. Sri K. Sandya Rani

CC/1940/2016 · 2026-03-01

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010102902016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1940/2016 Between: 1. A. SRINIVAS RAO, S/O A. RAMA RAO, AGE 49 YEARS, OCC: JUNIOR LECTURER, AFDT JUNIOR COLLEGE, MALKIPURAM, SAKKINETIPALLY MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI, R/O. MALKIPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K SANDYA RANI, The Commissioner of Intermediate Education, (Higher Education), Sifabad, Hyderabad. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondents for not complying with the judgment in Writ Petition No.15800 of 2015, dated 08.06.2015, and punish them for willful disobedience and violating the court order under contempt of courts Act 1971 and pass such other orders. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MSVS SUDHA RANI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. B RAMESH 2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1940 of 2016 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 08.06.2015 passed in W.P.No.15800 of 2015. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. M.S.V.S.Sudha Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his legal remedies in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, recording the said submissions, the contempt case is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his legal remedies in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 02.03.2026 RMR 4 94 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1940 of 2016 02.03.2026 W RMR