APHC010105112015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 863/2015 Between: 1. SRI VISHNU SEVASHRAMAM AND YOGASHRAMAM, PITHAPURAM ROAD, OPP:BOAT CLUB, KAKINADA - 533 003 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT D. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, S/O LATE VEERA RAGHAVA RAJU, AGED 74 YEARS, RIO. KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MR CHANDRA SEKHAR AZAD, THE REGIONAL JOINT COMMISSIONER, MULTI ZONE-1, KAKINADA 2. MRS ANURADHA IAS, THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon the Respondents and punish under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully violating the order dated 26.09.2014 in W.P.M.P.No.36901 of 2014 in W.P.No.21594 of 2008 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 542 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings Rc.No.22/21581/2014 dated 20.04.2015 issued by the 2nd Respondent herein and further direct the Respondents not to interfere with the management and affairs of the Petitioner Institution in any manner or form and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:863 OF 2015 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 26.09.2014 in I.A. No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.21594 of 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s). 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri R.Sri Charan, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that since the writ petition itself is dismissed as infructuous, the present contempt case cannot be enforced. Hence, requested to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.03.2026 BSP/TPS 05 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.863 of 2015 02.03.2026 BSP/TPS