Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18123 (PAT)

Md. Tahjib v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./10261/2026 · 2026-06-17

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10261 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-636 Year-2025 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Tahjib S/o- Abdul Majid R/v- Bari Rampur, W.No-3, Ps- Raniganj Dist- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Nahida Khatoon D/o- Noor Alam, W/o- Md. Tahjib R/v- Bari Rampur, W.No-3, Ps- Raniganj Dist- Araria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP For the Informant : Mr. Azaj Akhtar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 17-06-2026 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Azaj Akhtar, learned counsel for the informant beside the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 636 of 2025 instituted under Section 85 of B.N.S., 2023 and ¾ of Muslim Adhikar Suraksha Act lodged by the informant, Nahida Khatoon. 3. As per the prosecution story, the allegation of the lady is that the marriage took place on 09.07.2020 but she was always tortured for dowry and later after uttering the three words, she was thrown out. 4. Earlier, the Coordinate Bench sent the matter to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10261 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 2/2 Mediation Center but as per the report dated 15.05.2026 neither the petitioner chose to appear nor made the payment of Rs. 10,000/- as per the order passed by the Coordinate Bench on 25.05.2026. 5. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the conduct of the petitioner coupled with the allegation against him, no relief can be extended. 6. The anticipatory bail applications stands rejected. Ravi/Shivangi (Rajiv Roy, J) U T